Webo Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings and Gould 1986- lorry trailer with wheels had been used for 1yr+ for storage. Had steps and electricity supply, but held to not be a building … http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Table-of-cases-K-Q.php
Burglary Flashcards Quizlet
WebNorfolk constabulary v Seekings and Gould (1986) A lorry trailer with wheels which had been used for storage for over a year had steps provided access and was connected to electricity, it was held as a building. The fact it and wheels means it remains as a vehicle . R v Walkington (1979) Web3 de mar. de 2024 · 1) A Building Question of fact R. v. Manning (1871) L. 1 C.C. 338 B & S v Leathley [1979] Crim LR 314 Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings and Gould … honda city bekas bandung
Property Offences: Burglary - Blogger
Web•Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings and Gould (1986) •B&S Leathley (1979) CONTRAST CASE FACTS Para 3- Point? Trespasser •There is an overlap with civil law (entry without consent of lawful occupier of the building) e.g. Jones and Smith (1976) •D must intent or be reckless- MR •The main problem is when the D has gone beyond the permission given to … WebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like R v Collins (1972), R v Brown (1985), R v Ryan (1996) and more. WebHowever, Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings and Gould (1986): freezer connected to an electricity supply was a non-inhabited vehicle and not a building. Part of a Building This is intended to deal with cases where D has permission to enter a building, but not into certain areas: Walkington (1979). D’s entry is a question for the magistrates or jury. fazer 600 olx es